congraz ms soh!!! gif birth to baby gal (whom she claim too impatient n decided to come out earlier... lolz) n dam cool.. e gal was born on 11/10 at 0118am(i tink) cool!! libraian.. yay!! n mornin baby.. so shld b v smart de (i oso mornin baby.. but i am a bit anomalous case hehe) n coz ms soh is IJcian.. was sayin shld send to IJ.. yay.. similart to me... lolz.. n hor... baby born in Mt Elizabeth... waseh.. my confirmation name is Elizabeth!! hahaz... so happy... =P

decided to take a break frm studyin.. anw.. i oso kind of depressed over my mock A lvl math paper.. total score for paper 1 n 2 is onli 141/200.. juz nice make it to A.. haiz...oh ya.. gp lect was totally boring.. but found out an interesting thing.. apparently Mr larry don like e sermons.. haha... tho he is religious... (he is a lector in my church.. )haha... n those priests he were referrin to.. i noe.. haha.. totally agree wif him... realli cmi lo.. anw..

today's main blog entry will b on N.K n its nuke test... lolz.. (muz practice GP =P) *act its coz i find it quite interestin*

N.K claimed to have detonated a nuclear bomb on Mon.. some ppl r speculatin tt is a fraud as e activity measured by S.Korea is onli 3.6 on Ritcher scale.. which is equivalent to blowin up 800 tonnes of dynamite.. whether or nt this test was real will require time n critical analysis.. so now lets assume its real.. so wat does it mean?? will there b an invasion of communist N.Korea?? juz like wat US did to topple the regime of Saddam?? or juz impose more sanctions on N.Korea...

N.korea undeniably has been quite troublesome, defiant, provocative n realli acts like a rebellious teenager.. e more authorative figs. (US) keep on naggin at N.K nt to test.. then they purposely go n test.. n their recent test is realli testin e patience of e international community.. even their longstanding ally of common ideology (China) is condemning their actions.. N.K is seriously losin its support.. n DPRK realli askin for it if they kena invaded.. nt onli so it jus seem sort of wrong tt they r investin n pumpin in so much $ to build nuclear weapons when they cannot even provide wif their ppl e essential food n items.. they rely heavily on humanitarian aid frm China, S.K n other countries... how long will DPRK continue to enjoy strong support frm its citizens as these aid r decreasing wif increased sanctions? hungry citizens will soon blame the gov for e lack of food n tt they r tryin to lead them to their death (religious input: similar to wat happened in e desert after Moses led e Israelites frm Egypt.. initally the Israelites was praising God tt they led them out of Egypt where they have little dignity n were slaves.. after days of eatin manna in e desert tt God had provided them wif.. they turned against God n complained to Moses tt he shld nt have led them out.. at least in Egypt they had food - Genisis) [haha.. digress]
regardin e consideration of using military force on N.K:
i tink its nt v likely.. US- some of her troops r stationed in Iraq, Afganistan n S.K.. her troops r stretched.. by dispatching more troops to N.K for invasion is further gg to reduce their troop no. besides an invasion is gg to cost Bush billions of $$.. n will set its economy back.. tis has a chain effect in other parts of this globalized world.. also.. wld one realli dare to attack a country tt possesses soo much nuclear power?? estimated tt N.K has enuf weapons grade plutonium to make 7 nuclear weapons.. (i wouldn realli wan to risk it.. i wld have more to lose as compared to N.K hu is alr in a horrible state, poor economy etc) n Bush is also preparin for its mdi-term polls... furthermore, invasion may destablise e entire region.. it will oso cause an influx of N.Koreans into S.K, China etc... all tryin to escape... tis is prob why China will b reluctant to support an invasion.. S.K will also sort of b against invasion coz nt onli will it have a refugee problem.. it will b e main base of American troops, n warring in S.K have detrimental effects on its economy and ppl..

arguments for wat N.K did:
it sort of giv them a leverage n act as a form of deterance.. as a nuclear power.. ppl will have to sort of listen to wat she has to say.. fear is a useful tool in political strategy.. it oso sort of gif them some protection against the US hu named her as an axis of evil along wif Iraq n Iran.. n it was done in retaliation against e economic sanctions tt US imposed on N.K as e latter is guilty of counterfeiting, money laundering and trafficking in WMD.. hu in e right frame of mind will gif up their weapons jus bcoz others say so..(but then again.. it will b beta 4 e country if they gave up their nuclear plans.. at least their ppl will nt b starvin n fear e possibility of invasion n further collapse of their country's economy.. by challenging e international community will lead to further isolation.. in today's world.. one cannot survive alone... there is a nd to recognise tt e world is becomin more n more globalized.. look at China.. its fellow communist fren.. tho by herself.. she has a strong populatin to support its economy.. she is openin up to e global markets.. n she is one of e fastest growin developin country.. while China is developin, N.K is undevelopin as she is being isolated, a consequence of her actions. e all hailed kim is responsible for e downfall of his nation.. besides i think that e $ they spend on developin nuclear weapons can b beta channelled into helpin its citizens n developin e country.. )

possible acceptance of N.K as one of e nuclear powers by international community:
hmm.. nt unlikely.. nations may eventually grow to accept N.K has join e ranks as a nuclear power which is currently occupied by US, India, China, France, Russia, Pakistan (i tink) but then again.. if N.K is accepted as a nuclear power there r fears tt there mayb a rush to build up nuclear weapons by Taiwan, Japan, etc.. if there is a build up of WMD, wat is e world gg to b like in e future? or will we nt have a future at all?? as every1 is wipin out each other... e end realli seems near.. haiz.. if N.K is accepted as a nuclear power.. tink tt will b quite disastrous.. DPRK is currently led by Kim Jong I1 one of e most unpredictable leaders.. e world is more n more unpredictable...

kz la.. tts it.. my conclusion: up to those hu read it to decide.. (shld b quite obvious) any comments can leave on my tag board..